Austria’s Covid legislation: The remarkable absence of authorship in public submissions to the consultative process

Austria’s legislative procedure provides for a consultative process which allows all citizens to make submissions in which they can raise their concerns as to a proposed bill. When making such a submission, submitters can decide whether their authorship and submission are published on the website of the parliament. Remarkably, the share of undisclosed authorships and statements is particularly high with bills introducing various restrictions to curtail the Covid epidemic.
Austria
COVID
Author

Roland Schmidt

Published

16 Mar 2021

1 Context

Here’s yet another post (see here and here) on public submissions to Covid-related bills as part of the public legislative consultation process in Austria (Stellungnahmen im Begutachtungsverfahren).

Earlier this month, the government introduced another Covid related bill (98/ME XXVII), which triggered again a new record number of filed submissions. This numerical peak in the legislative arena was paralleled by unprecedented hostile and partly violent demonstrations against the government. As in many countries, Covid demonstrations bring a colorful bunch of individuals to the street, including not only (if there is such a thing as) ‘ordinary’ citizens who may be exhausted and fearful for their e.g. economic future, but also right wing extremists (e.g. our former minister of interior), and other peculiar characters of highly dubious political shades.

All in all, the unprecedented ‘submission activism’ and the significant turnout at the demonstrations are suggesting that the opposition to the government’s Covid measures is far more than an aberration at the fringes or some freak cases. I think it’s not an exaggeration to describe the public discourse as increasingly antagonistic and polarized, even if one acknowledges that submissions as part of a legislative consultative process or participating in a demonstration can be completely legitimate expressions of a democratic discourse.

2 Submissions and non-disclosed authorship

However, with opposition to Covid measures increasingly visible, I was struck to notice that the text and authorship of many submissions related to 98/ME XXVII were not published on the parliament’s website. The records just state ‘Keine öffentliche Stellungnahme’ (No public statement). While it’s nothing unusual to have some submitters who prefer not to be named in public and hence choose the pertaining option when filing their submission, the frequency was remarkable when randomly scrolling through the list for the latest bill (see here; to be clear, the parliament’s relevant office has the names of the authors, they are just not published on the website).

This made me wonder whether my observation was just based on an unrepresentative sample or the reflection of a wider pattern: Are Covid-related bills featuring more submissions with not publicly disclosed authorship?

This is just a blog post and not rigorously thought through, but I found the question particularly interesting since it reminded me of reports about right wing voters who either submit wrong or no answers at all when surveyed as to their voting intentions. Since their actual voting preference may be e.g. perceived as controversial, they prefer to keep it to themselves and do not answer truthfully. This is only a very crude description (see e.g. ‘Shy Trump voters 2016’, Bradley effect etc…), and I am not claiming that the same mechanism is actually at play in the Covid submission case, but I found the parallel intriguing enough to crunch the numbers.

3 Code

Unfold the snippet below to get the code for the analysis. I inserted comments where I thought they might be helpful.

4 Result

I guess the plot below speaks (hopefully) for itself: Those bills with Covid relation (in orange) not only feature much more filed submissions (size of the dots), they also feature much more submissions without the author and the text of the submission being publicly disclosed (location on the x-axis). The difference to submissions related to other bills is quite remarkable.

Back to top

Reuse

Citation

BibTeX citation:
@online{schmidt2021,
  author = {Schmidt, Roland},
  title = {Austria’s {Covid} Legislation: {The} Remarkable Absence of
    Authorship in Public Submissions to the Consultative Process},
  date = {2021-03-16},
  url = {https://werk.statt.codes/posts/2021-03-10-covidsubmissionsnoauthor},
  langid = {en}
}
For attribution, please cite this work as:
Schmidt, Roland. 2021. “Austria’s Covid Legislation: The Remarkable Absence of Authorship in Public Submissions to the Consultative Process.” March 16, 2021. https://werk.statt.codes/posts/2021-03-10-covidsubmissionsnoauthor.